bird_call wrote:I know the Trump administration revoked the Title IX guidance for NIL, but is that going to hold up in court? I just don't see how it is possible for 90+% of NIL money through universities to go to men's sports and not fall afoul of Title IX.
I'm not saying it has to be 50:50, but I bet there will be a lot of legal challenges in the next 6-12 months when there's 2 billion of NIL money at stake.
My opinion is NIL money to a particular college sports team should be directly correlated to how much money a particular sports team brings in, with allowance for some subsidies of sports that don’t bring in much money. If we are going to treat NIL as “business”, then apply business principles to it. If Jays basketball between ticket sales, TV rights payments, etc., brings in 95% of sports money to CU, then the basketball program should get close to 95% of NIL monies. If Jays women’s volleyball, which I do wholeheartedly support, only generates a much smaller amount of revenue, it should only get its share, with some discretionary small additional amount the AD or administration can give to it from the basketball revenue for expenses. There is no equitable analysis to have monies equally shared by all sports programs that is being brought in by mostly college football and basketball. (Although obviously we are seeing more TV deals and attendance at women’s basketball and volleyball as a national trend). If split other than money brought in, sounds a lot like socialism being applied to college sports.