NCAA T

Talk about YOUR Creighton Bluejays!

Return to Men's Hoops

Re: NCAA T

Postby HaRdWoOd » Mon Mar 17, 2025 9:57 am

I think I would almost rather have Xaviers draw than Creightons. Play-in game against Texas, then #6 Illinois, then 3 seed Kentucky, vs road game against #8 Louisville, #1 Auburn.
Committee had a difficult job when they let 14 SEC teams in. Certainly had to move teams up and down the seed line to avoid early matchups. No excuse for letting UNC in though.
HaRdWoOd
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:33 pm

 

Re: NCAA T

Postby SeattleJay » Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:42 am

taa71458 wrote:
SonofFrankTomera wrote:
taa71458 wrote:Couldn’t make up the owh headline story right now if I tried


Color me confused (not hard to do). What did the good folks at OWH have to say? Was it Snacks Mckewons’ article about unl?

Yeah they moved it down but for awhile after the bracket release that was the headline story. Jays men and women in, UNO first time ever, husker women in the field, but lets talk about husker football and men's basketball!

When I looked at my OWH link today, I couldn’t help but laugh when I saw UNlL to the Crown as the lead story. The most important thing for Omahans to know. Well, at least they are consistent. You have to give them that.
SeattleJay
 
Posts: 2050
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: NCAA T

Postby SeattleJay » Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:51 am

I posted a comment to the article, “This is your lead story today?”

If anyone here is as dumb as I am to subscribe to this poor excuse of a local paper, please add your viewpoint.
SeattleJay
 
Posts: 2050
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: NCAA T

Postby jaysfor3 » Mon Mar 17, 2025 11:39 am

My mom of 80 years old on a fixed income who faithfully subscribed for many decades cancelled because it was exorbitant (I think she said $1,000 year) and it had become too liberal biased and not balanced. She's a fan of both Creighton and Nebraska going to neither school but likes to follow and support teams in the state.
jaysfor3
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:26 pm

Re: NCAA T

Postby JayPak » Mon Mar 17, 2025 4:19 pm

Xavier might have the best draw ever for a play-team.
Starts with playing 50 miles from campus in Dayton against a mediocre Texas team about to fire their coach. Then they go to Milwaukee, a venue they are very familiar with, to play a mediocre Illinois team and a spiraling Kentucky.

Would love that draw for Creighton if it didn’t involve the extra game.

Big East disrespected though the committee threw a bone to Xavier to make up for the double snub last year. Since when does the clear #2 team in a 5-bid conference get slapped with a 9-seed and sent to a 1st round road game?
“...When people ask me where I went to school at, I probably won’t even say the other school anymore. It’s just gonna be Creighton. This is where I grew, where I learned to be a man and a basketball player. This is where I became Jamiya Neal.”
User avatar
JayPak
 
Posts: 2981
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:00 am

Re: NCAA T

Postby gtmoBlue » Mon Mar 17, 2025 4:34 pm

Agree. I found it deeply troubling that the #2 team in the Big East gets a 9-seed??? Adding insult to injury is that both the #3 & #4 teams get a higher seeding... Please explain this. :shock:
"This is our time. This is our great opportunity... Standing strong - for a great, great future." - Fr Timothy Lannon, SJ
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Nicholas Klein (1918)
User avatar
gtmoBlue
 
Posts: 4341
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:43 am
Location: Canal Zone, Panama

Re: NCAA T

Postby SDJay » Mon Mar 17, 2025 4:57 pm

gtmoBlue wrote:Agree. I found it deeply troubling that the #2 team in the Big East gets a 9-seed??? Adding insult to injury is that both the #3 & #4 teams get a higher seeding... Please explain this. :shock:

Part of the issue, as others have noted, is that the BE was putrid in OOC. Wins in conference play didn't move the NET up as much as previous years, and a loss was a real drag.
The Jays losing at home to Huskers was part of CU's contribution to the horrendous OOC record.
"Have fun storming the Castle!"- Miracle Max
“Endeavor to persevere”- Lone Watie
SDJay
 
Posts: 1200
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:41 am
Location: Near Lake Wobegon

Re: NCAA T

Postby Realhoops » Tue Mar 18, 2025 6:55 am

Seriously think they need a hard line rule that you are not eligible for the NCAAT without being over .500. And then keep the other metrics like quality of wins, quality of schedule, etc., as a bit of a check on totally loading up on poor competition to get there. They have a minimum # of wins requirement in football, and this would be a comparable consideration.

It's absolutely absurd that schools can lose 2/3 of their conference games and still seemingly be easily in the tournament simply because they are in a conference that is viewed as a powerhouse. At some point actually winning those games against that really tough competition has to be a consideration.
_________________
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then ... I contradict myself.
I am large ... I contain multitudes.
--Walt Whitman
User avatar
Realhoops
 
Posts: 4907
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:10 am
Location: In your head.

Re: NCAA T

Postby psychojaysfan3 » Tue Mar 18, 2025 9:08 am

SDJay wrote:
gtmoBlue wrote:Agree. I found it deeply troubling that the #2 team in the Big East gets a 9-seed??? Adding insult to injury is that both the #3 & #4 teams get a higher seeding... Please explain this. :shock:

Part of the issue, as others have noted, is that the BE was putrid in OOC. Wins in conference play didn't move the NET up as much as previous years, and a loss was a real drag.
The Jays losing at home to Huskers was part of CU's contribution to the horrendous OOC record.


While a feel a little slighted, its also hard for me to be too upset with the committee by our seeding. Our best nonconference wins were Kansas, Notre Dame, and UNLV. ND and UNLV are trash and Kansas was maybe the most overrated team in the country.

We lost all 4 of our other major non con games (SDSU, Nebraska, A&M, and Alabama). Got whipped by Nebraska AT HOME and SDSU on a neutral court and totally blew a winnable game against A&M.

In conference play, the Big East was not nearly as strong this year and while we won a lot of conference games, I would not say that we were overly dominant.

At the end of day, what hurt us is the 5-4 record in Q2. Had we beat Nebraska and SDSU and finished 7-2 in Q2, our seeding would look very different.

Its abundantly clear how much the committee values non conference games and we just severely underperformed in that department.
psychojaysfan3
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2024 2:25 pm

Re: NCAA T

Postby taa71458 » Wed Mar 19, 2025 4:44 am

An unsurprising blowout for UNC last night. Feel like the most undeserving teams always make a dumb ncaa tourney run.
User avatar
taa71458
 
Posts: 5475
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:36 am
Location: The Trademark Office

PreviousNext

Return to Men's Hoops

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gtmoBlue and 50 guests