JaysLifer wrote:Chicagojayfan wrote:taa71458 wrote:God forbid a kid wants to go make a living or get more playing time or get out of a situation where a cosh probably lied to him to get him to go there or get out of a situation where his coach bolted because they don't have to sit out a year when they love schools.
No issue with a kid making a living, BUT the schools are not responsible for aiding them in that by providing the ability for them to do a 1 and done that essentially makes a joke of the student athlete image.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/co ... story.html
So it's your belief that a school should not facilitate a kid's desire to find a career? Hot take, my friend.
Nice Straw man, but I'll play along -- So should colleges be obliged to facilitate any kid's desire for any career regardless of alignment with their academic mission?
The D-league exists as a place where kids can go play Basketball if their desire is to be a professional basketball player. Additionally, European and international teams sign kids all the time. Why should colleges act as if their academic principles should be subjugated to a kid's desire to play professional ball? There are plenty of other ways for them to pursue that career without making a joke of the concept of "student athletes"
- As for the 5-8 rule, there is plenty of room there for kids to transfer and it provides some limitations on coaches like Cal and to limit oversigning.
- Cracking down on the senior transfer rule makes sense because the rule doesn't even do what it purports to accomplish.