HandDownManDown wrote:Bluejay Bilas wrote:Wizard of Westroads wrote:I'm always puzzled by the applauding of the recruitment of new guys when it's obvious that means somebody on the current roster has to go. In the absence of a reason such as homesickness, grades, failed drug tests, etc., this means the staff's evaluation of a current player was wrong and they weren't able to develop him when he got here. So now the same staff has evaluated a new player and we're excited?
I'm not ripping on the staff, recruiting is partly a crap shoot. I just don't get all the excitement here for something that obviously means pushing out a player, especially when we love the current culture. To each his own in the world of anonymous message board posting, I guess.
Generally, that's pretty accurate. But remember that 4 of the 13 current scholarship guys were MVC commits. The transition has created a unique situation. It was at least partially responsible for Johnson, Yates, Harris, Norton, and Talbert going elsewhere. If we end up with another MVC guy leaving, hard to blame staff evaluation for that.
So you're cool with, say, telling Hanson to find a new school?
Not really. But, Hanson or Hegner leaving would be different in terms of the Wiz of Westroads evaluation concern than if Gilmore or Harrell left. Guess I'd feel about the same about it as I did when Harris left year. Not ideal, but the team did go 4-14 in conference partially cause there was a big talent gap between CU and the top teams.