Chicagojayfan wrote:JayPak wrote:Chicagojayfan wrote:It's a good class but not great without Ellenson, a class I'd probably rank behind ours.
No way! You must be counting Huff and Watson as 2015's, then. Even so, that's a stretch. Per Rivals, even without 5-star Ellenson, they've got 2 4-star and 2-3 stars to our 1 4-star and 3 3-stars. Per ESPN, Marquette's advantage is much wider, with 4 4's to our 1 4 and 2 3's (ESPN doesn't rate Krampelj).
Also, keep in mind that Marquette gets every one of those 5 guys for up to 4 years, while we get Huff and Watson for 2.
Marquette's class is 9th in the country per ESPN and you say it's "not great" without Ellenson??
no time to break it all down, but with Watson and Huff it isn't even close. They only have one top 150 guy in their class. It's a good class, but not extraordinary. Adding Ellenson makes all the difference.
Cheatham is a consensus Top 100. Carter will be a top 150 at year end too.