Duke1Agn wrote:This doesn't make much sense, unless the staff views Stewart as more of a combo guard. We will have two PGs plus a walk-on PG on the roster already next year.
He does look like a good player, though. Has a bunch of good offers.
mredle wrote:I think it makes good sense to go after Carter. Next year we have Watson and if get Carter we have two freshmen point guards behind him. How freshmen react moving from high school to D-1 is always uncertain that first year, so they are a bit of an insurance policy in terms of depth at the position. Mac has also demonstrated that he likes having multiple passers on the floor at the same time and the kid is a shooter.
section221jay wrote:
I'm not sure how many insurance policies you can afford with 13 scholarships.
You pretty much know Mo Watson is going to start and be pretty decent next year. You know you have a true frosh that will back him up...I'd wait til next year before adding another.
The jays are small enough. I don't know that adding another 6'1" PG is the ideal situation. And having multiple 6' guys on the court at the same time is not probably a good idea in the big east.
gtmoBlue wrote:section221jay wrote:
I'm not sure how many insurance policies you can afford with 13 scholarships.
You pretty much know Mo Watson is going to start and be pretty decent next year. You know you have a true frosh that will back him up...I'd wait til next year before adding another.
The jays are small enough. I don't know that adding another 6'1" PG is the ideal situation. And having multiple 6' guys on the court at the same time is not probably a good idea in the big east.
Good post. With one scholie left officially, it seems that a talented, long, athletic SG is the priority. Jays are on several (6-3 to 6-5 SGs) in Dillard, Ellison, Walton, Kyrie, and Council. One of these guys would be a big boost at the SG and for the roster.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests