Jet915 wrote:Ive never watched Nelson play but his shooting numbers arent good and his assist/to numbers are negative am i missing something?
This is confusing to me. He would be a Kaluma replacement.. Comparing the shooting numbers I would consider Nelson slightly better, but if you consider the step up in competition to the BE they are probably comparable.
Kaluma - .423 FG / .311 3PT / .736 FT
Nelson - .521 FG / .269 3 PT / .720 FT
Assist to turnover ratio is also not the greatest way to measure their ability to perform as PFs, but again they are comparable. Should probably also consider Nelson was the focal point of their offense and likely drew other teams best defenders/double teams. He also put up 12.7 shots per game to Kalumas 9.3 - meaning he likely had the ball in his hands significantly more and had more opportunities to turn the ball over. Still have to consider the step up in competition again, so likely similar again.
Kaluma - 1.6 assist / 2.1 TO = 0.76 ratio
Nelson - 2.1 assist / 2.6 TO = 0.80 ratio
One of the more important stats IMO for their position would be rebounds. This is something that would likely translate immediately (Baylor went from 7.8 RPG in the Summit to 8.3 RPG in the BE). I think Nelson has the significant edge here.
Kaluma - 6.0 RPG / 0.6 Blocks
Nelson - 9.3 RPG / 1.7 Blocks
Kaluma may not have been a fan favorite by any means, but he is still a solid player and is in contention to be drafted for a reason. I have no idea if the coaches will pursue him or not, but I think he may be better than our current NBA draft player and significantly better at this point in his career than our other options at the 4. With Kalk and Trey back, I think we are still a top 15 team in the country, but the addition of Nelson would make us immediate national champion contenders.