Future Schedules

Talk about YOUR Creighton Bluejays!

Return to Men's Hoops

Re: Future Schedules

Postby HandDownManDown » Fri May 04, 2012 11:32 am

Baylor is searching for a game that same Nov 9/10 weekend. I wonder if they'd be amenable to a game?
User avatar
HandDownManDown
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:14 pm
Location: Little Italy

 

Re: Future Schedules

Postby creightonotter » Fri May 04, 2012 11:38 am

HandDownManDown wrote:Baylor is searching for a game that same Nov 9/10 weekend. I wonder if they'd be amenable to a game?


Only if they can bring the live bear Pierre Jackson got to pet on his recruiting visit. Heck, after all their defections, etc., the bear might have to suit up. Still, I'd give the edge to Gregory in that low post battle.
User avatar
creightonotter
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:08 am

Re: Future Schedules

Postby gtmoBlue » Sat May 05, 2012 11:47 pm

Schools with open dates (Nov 9 or 10) and looking for a game:

Arkansas
Baylor - ranked
Miami-florida
New Mexico - ranked
Temple - ranked

06 May 2012... Add Arizona... Looking for a 'buy game' on the 9th of Nov.
"This is our time. This is our great opportunity... Standing strong - for a great, great future." - Fr Timothy Lannon, SJ
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Nicholas Klein (1918)
User avatar
gtmoBlue
 
Posts: 4322
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:43 am
Location: Canal Zone, Panama

Re: Future Schedules

Postby RVB » Wed May 09, 2012 11:46 pm

Bluejay men seeking higher profile opening foe

http://www.omaha.com/article/20120509/B ... pening-foe
RVB
 
Posts: 8157
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:40 am

Re: Future Schedules

Postby gtmoBlue » Thu May 10, 2012 12:55 am

With the ESPN Pre-Season Poll as a guide...

Of the few teams above who are looking for a game in our time window,
only Baylor or Arizona are currently in the pre-season polls.

Neither Temple nor NMexico are in the ESPN pre-season poll.
If coach is looking for a Top 75 rpi team. Baylor may be our best shot?
"This is our time. This is our great opportunity... Standing strong - for a great, great future." - Fr Timothy Lannon, SJ
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Nicholas Klein (1918)
User avatar
gtmoBlue
 
Posts: 4322
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:43 am
Location: Canal Zone, Panama

Re: Future Schedules

Postby wildjays » Sat May 12, 2012 9:04 am

In Piv's chat on Friday it appears the opening on the schedule was not due to the Loyola-Chicago game being pushed to 2014-15, but due to a game with Alcorn State that was moved to '13-14. That is interesting as it appears there was never any intent to play the Loyola game next season and that it was decided well in advance that it was pushed to the '14-15 season since the Alcorn St. game was already scheduled.

That being said, it looks like the '13-14 season only has a couple games left to be scheduled as well based on the schedule so far.

Anaheim Classic (San Diego State, Marquette known so far)
@ St. Joe's
@ Long Beach State
California
Nebraska
Tulsa
Alcorn State
White & Blue Review-- http://whiteandbluereview.com
User avatar
wildjays
 
Posts: 2741
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:05 am

Re: Future Schedules

Postby blueblood » Sat May 12, 2012 10:16 am

The chat also told us that Kansas basically laughed in our face when we asked for a game. Duh. Could someone clue in Dirk this happens all the time please? I for one am sick of the CU needs to change ITS scheduling philosphy. As if when Creighton calls and a BCS type says no its some how our fault. How about an article that the BCSers need to change their philosphy? Where is the uproar about their crappy nonconf. schedules? Take a look at the BCSers with open slots and do some research on why its allowed for them to be worried about an easy win and making money. There are numerous teams that have not played ANY true road games they weren't forced to play for years. They also have BCS money but they can't schedule CU for money reasons. They want a name team. Creighton will be preseason top 20 and have a consensus All American. Yet Creighton who is dwarfed by BCSers in money is the one that should step it up and not worry about money and pick up the phone to be laughed at time and again which they do. Bullshit. How about Dirk call some of these teams and be as up front with his questions to them? He won't. Instead of Dirk telling Creighton what he thinks they sould do(not knowing they already have), how about him tellling some BCSers to man up and put us on their schedule? He won't. It gets old.
“Drinking beer doesn't make you fat, It makes you lean....
Against bars, tables, chairs, and poles.”
User avatar
blueblood
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:36 am

Re: Future Schedules

Postby gtmoBlue » Sat May 12, 2012 2:32 pm

What's the latest on FR Lannon and the 'push'? to join the A-10?
"This is our time. This is our great opportunity... Standing strong - for a great, great future." - Fr Timothy Lannon, SJ
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Nicholas Klein (1918)
User avatar
gtmoBlue
 
Posts: 4322
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:43 am
Location: Canal Zone, Panama

Re: Future Schedules

Postby LynchMob » Sat May 12, 2012 4:47 pm

gtmoBlue wrote:What's the latest on FR Lannon and the 'push'? to join the A-10?


To the extent it was ever real, appears dead/dormant for now.
Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose!
LynchMob
 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: Future Schedules

Postby Outlaw_Wales » Sun May 13, 2012 8:43 am

blueblood wrote:The chat also told us that Kansas basically laughed in our face when we asked for a game. Duh. Could someone clue in Dirk this happens all the time please? I for one am sick of the CU needs to change ITS scheduling philosphy. As if when Creighton calls and a BCS type says no its some how our fault. How about an article that the BCSers need to change their philosphy? Where is the uproar about their crappy nonconf. schedules? Take a look at the BCSers with open slots and do some research on why its allowed for them to be worried about an easy win and making money. There are numerous teams that have not played ANY true road games they weren't forced to play for years. They also have BCS money but they can't schedule CU for money reasons. They want a name team. Creighton will be preseason top 20 and have a consensus All American. Yet Creighton who is dwarfed by BCSers in money is the one that should step it up and not worry about money and pick up the phone to be laughed at time and again which they do. Bullshit. How about Dirk call some of these teams and be as up front with his questions to them? He won't. Instead of Dirk telling Creighton what he thinks they sould do(not knowing they already have), how about him tellling some BCSers to man up and put us on their schedule? He won't. It gets old.


... and yet today's OWH has two more front-sports page stories, including Dirk AGAIN saying we need to schedule Kansas or somebody like them, and Shatel asking how the Jays can "stay relevant."

Why are all the Jays stories being written by the Husker writers? Where is Pivovar?
User avatar
Outlaw_Wales
 
Posts: 1389
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 4:25 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Men's Hoops

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 11 guests