go_jays wrote:Anybody that didn't see this coming wasn't paying attention.
Yup. I recall having an argument with someone on this board or the other one back when NIL started. He swore up and down that the money could only be used for name, image and likeness and that the kids deserved it. I replied with, “okay, I’m a booster and I want to give a kid $300k. I’m sure I’ll be able to do it. What if I just tell the kid to give me an autographed basketball and I give him the check. We say I’m paying for his autograph for my collection.” I was told this could never happen because it wouldn’t look legit. Please. And this was before collectives!
I read Barry Switzer’s book once. He talked about the days when college kids could have jobs. He said he hired his players to babysit his kids. The key: he paid them $100 an hour. In the 1970s. He also talked about kids getting paid obscene amounts to water the grass in the summer. All these shady situations led the NCAA to restrict D1 kids from having jobs, even in the offseason.
It’s all a joke and anyone who never thought it would happen is naive or clueless. Or both.