2024-25 Season

Talk about YOUR Creighton Bluejays!

Return to Men's Hoops

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby Chicagojayfan » Mon Oct 07, 2024 11:15 am

WBR Tom wrote:We compiled Matt's Twitter Q&A into a mailbag column for those who may have missed it, or don't have a Twitter account:

https://whiteandbluereview.com/creighto ... ober-2024/


One skeptical note I would toss in about that starting lineup is this: It would mean that "let if fly" would be starting 3 guys whose 3 PT% last year was 28.6%, 27.5%, and 29.3%. And while there are plenty of explanations for their numbers last year and plenty of hope that they could/should improve during games, asking 3 guys to significantly improve to at least average tends to be a poor bet
Chicagojayfan
 
Posts: 6840
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:53 pm

 

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby cujaysfan » Mon Oct 07, 2024 12:37 pm

I'm in favor of modifying LIF, if it means we are more effective at getting to the rim and converting and not suffering through shooting drought losses.

Space and pace will still be important. And the hope is that Mac can help guys be more efficient if they understand the offense and our philosophies.

It's going to be a fun year to see how this plays out.
User avatar
cujaysfan
 
Posts: 7046
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:34 am

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby Jaysker12 » Mon Oct 07, 2024 2:28 pm

Chicagojayfan wrote:
WBR Tom wrote:We compiled Matt's Twitter Q&A into a mailbag column for those who may have missed it, or don't have a Twitter account:

https://whiteandbluereview.com/creighto ... ober-2024/


One skeptical note I would toss in about that starting lineup is this: It would mean that "let if fly" would be starting 3 guys whose 3 PT% last year was 28.6%, 27.5%, and 29.3%. And while there are plenty of explanations for their numbers last year and plenty of hope that they could/should improve during games, asking 3 guys to significantly improve to at least average tends to be a poor bet


Coaches adapt to the roster. We may not be as dependent on the 3 ball as we have been. The 21-22 team was similarly constructed (one proven veteran shooter plus a bunch of question marks). They were still competitive. We will be too even if our 3pt shooting takes a dive.

Fedor being ruled eligible gives us a 2nd proven shooter.
Jaysker12
 
Posts: 1666
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:16 pm

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby Chicagojayfan » Mon Oct 07, 2024 3:21 pm

Jaysker12 wrote:
Chicagojayfan wrote:
WBR Tom wrote:We compiled Matt's Twitter Q&A into a mailbag column for those who may have missed it, or don't have a Twitter account:

https://whiteandbluereview.com/creighto ... ober-2024/


One skeptical note I would toss in about that starting lineup is this: It would mean that "let if fly" would be starting 3 guys whose 3 PT% last year was 28.6%, 27.5%, and 29.3%. And while there are plenty of explanations for their numbers last year and plenty of hope that they could/should improve during games, asking 3 guys to significantly improve to at least average tends to be a poor bet


Coaches adapt to the roster. We may not be as dependent on the 3 ball as we have been. The 21-22 team was similarly constructed (one proven veteran shooter plus a bunch of question marks). They were still competitive. We will be too even if our 3pt shooting takes a dive.

Fedor being ruled eligible gives us a 2nd proven shooter.


and, even though they made the tourney and were a 9th seed, I'd have to think we are looking for something more this year. It was also something of a rebuild as we played 3 Frosh extensively, and signed a grad transfer to help bridge the gap, along with O'Connell who was another transfer

I feel like Pop Isaacs will bounce back. He shot 37.8% as a Frosh and was hurt last year and had a big usage jump at Texas Tech (meaning he needed to take a lot of shots when the offense wasn't working), but counting on all 3 to have that big of a jump (including Neal who has never shot over 30% from 3) doesn't feel like a good bet, particularly when we have Kalk and Ash back for their 5th years

We'll see what happens, but if there's a year when the lineup changes a few times, it's probably this year, and we may see some guys who are on the floor, but paired with other players to help keep the balance - meaning fewer minutes for some starters and more minutes for a bit deeper bench rotation. We'll see
Chicagojayfan
 
Posts: 6840
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:53 pm

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby Realhoops » Mon Oct 07, 2024 5:06 pm

The eligibility questions aside -- I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around a prediction that Sterling Knox is more likely to be competing for playing time than Fedor coming over after several years of being competent in an actual pro league against grown men. Aside from the eligibility issues -- what would I be missing?
_________________
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then ... I contradict myself.
I am large ... I contain multitudes.
--Walt Whitman
User avatar
Realhoops
 
Posts: 4678
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:10 am
Location: In your head.

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby SeattleJay » Mon Oct 07, 2024 5:53 pm

Realhoops wrote:The eligibility questions aside -- I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around a prediction that Sterling Knox is more likely to be competing for playing time than Fedor coming over after several years of being competent in an actual pro league against grown men. Aside from the eligibility issues -- what would I be missing?


My guess is that Matt is thinking in the near term and Fedor may not be eligible immediately.

Also, I think Knox might be more of a primary ball handler.

Finally, it sounds like Knox is having a great start to practice. Someone else mentioned that Fedor didn’t come to Omaha in top shape.

Those are my guesses.
SeattleJay
 
Posts: 1714
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby JacobPadilla » Mon Oct 07, 2024 6:14 pm

I think the roster is pretty clearly built to let it fly. They may have less ability to attack the basket this year than they did last year, even though that wasn't necessarily Trey and Baylor's strength. An Ashworth and Isaacs backcourt is not going to give you much in the way of effective rim scoring (Isaacs was very bad at it even during his freshman year when he was healthy).

Ashworth, Isaacs, Miller, Traudt, Zugic and McAndrew are all guys who you would probably list 3-point shooting at or near the top of the list of what they bring. Green has put in a lot of work and seen results; we'll have to see how that translates to the games once the season starts.

Isaacs' shooting talent is much better than a 29.7% would indicate. In watching both his freshman and sophomore tape, I'm largely willing to write off last year, especially if his shot selection improves in what should be a more functional offense at Creighton.

To be honest, I'm not sure what to think of Neal. He was sick during the practice I watched so I didn't see him in person, and he was in a completely dysfunctional offense at Arizona State. He's a horrible shooter off the dribble yet took nearly two-thirds of his jumpers off the bounce. He actually made a decent percentage of his open catch-and-shoot looks, and Mac's offense is pretty good at generating those. He's also pretty effective at the rim but the volume was way too low for a player of his athleticism and effectiveness.

Mac said as much on this topic, but they're largely betting on getting more out of Isaacs and Neal in his offense than what we saw of them at their previous stops.

Quote from the first day of practice: “In the transfer portal, you have to dig really deep. Neither of them were incredibly efficient at the places that were, but if you dig deep enough, there were some shots that were really efficient — if they took the right shots. And some of it is a product of the offense, some of it is a product of the system, some of it is a product of them making better decisions of what's the difference between a good shot and a bad shot. But in the recruiting process, they were both hungry to become more efficient, and I think they saw us as an avenue to do that.”

Without Trey and Baylor creating as much offense as they did, I'm hoping Creighton will be able to run the offense through Kalkbrenner to an even greater degree this season while continuing to space the floor around him. He's the best bet at keeping this offense balanced.
JacobPadilla
 
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:41 am

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby Django » Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:52 am

Both Baylor and Ash were better shooters at the mid-major level than in the Big East so with Pop and Neal transferring from the B12 and PAC it bodes better for them transferring from a major to a major. I trust in Mac’s judgement. He will sort it out I have no doubts. This team appears to be loaded and who the heck knows who will be starting in February.

PS: Field of 68 After Dark just dropped their Creighton off-season grades.
At Creighton Bob Gibson majored in sociology and starred in Basketball and Baseball. In 1957 Gibson received a $3,000 sign-on bonus with St. Louis Cardinals, but delayed his HOF Cards career a year to play pro B-ball with the Harlem Globetrotters.
User avatar
Django
 
Posts: 2093
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2018 6:43 pm

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby SeattleJay » Tue Oct 08, 2024 3:28 pm

Kalk is the preseason BE POY per CBS sports

https://www.cbssports.com/college-baske ... watch/amp/
SeattleJay
 
Posts: 1714
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: 2024-25 Season

Postby go_jays » Tue Oct 08, 2024 3:38 pm

JacobPadilla wrote:I think the roster is pretty clearly built to let it fly. They may have less ability to attack the basket this year than they did last year, even though that wasn't necessarily Trey and Baylor's strength. An Ashworth and Isaacs backcourt is not going to give you much in the way of effective rim scoring (Isaacs was very bad at it even during his freshman year when he was healthy).

Ashworth, Isaacs, Miller, Traudt, Zugic and McAndrew are all guys who you would probably list 3-point shooting at or near the top of the list of what they bring. Green has put in a lot of work and seen results; we'll have to see how that translates to the games once the season starts.

Isaacs' shooting talent is much better than a 29.7% would indicate. In watching both his freshman and sophomore tape, I'm largely willing to write off last year, especially if his shot selection improves in what should be a more functional offense at Creighton.

To be honest, I'm not sure what to think of Neal. He was sick during the practice I watched so I didn't see him in person, and he was in a completely dysfunctional offense at Arizona State. He's a horrible shooter off the dribble yet took nearly two-thirds of his jumpers off the bounce. He actually made a decent percentage of his open catch-and-shoot looks, and Mac's offense is pretty good at generating those. He's also pretty effective at the rim but the volume was way too low for a player of his athleticism and effectiveness.

Mac said as much on this topic, but they're largely betting on getting more out of Isaacs and Neal in his offense than what we saw of them at their previous stops.

Quote from the first day of practice: “In the transfer portal, you have to dig really deep. Neither of them were incredibly efficient at the places that were, but if you dig deep enough, there were some shots that were really efficient — if they took the right shots. And some of it is a product of the offense, some of it is a product of the system, some of it is a product of them making better decisions of what's the difference between a good shot and a bad shot. But in the recruiting process, they were both hungry to become more efficient, and I think they saw us as an avenue to do that.”

Without Trey and Baylor creating as much offense as they did, I'm hoping Creighton will be able to run the offense through Kalkbrenner to an even greater degree this season while continuing to space the floor around him. He's the best bet at keeping this offense balanced.


I think Kalkbrenner is going to have an incredible season. He was noticeably bigger in the shoulders in the last pic I saw of him. Hopefully he's gained some muscle in his core and legs as well. If he has, he will be a beast. And that added strength will also make him a more confident player. The matchup with Dickinson will tell us a lot about how much his game has progressed. And I have a feeling he will dominate him.
go_jays
 
Posts: 2788
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:22 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Men's Hoops

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FreddyMac, RxJay1 and 51 guests