Future Schedules

Talk about YOUR Creighton Bluejays!

Return to Men's Hoops

Re: Future Schedules

Postby Rik » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:07 pm

LJay wrote:Pine Bluff, UMKC, Alcorn and Chi-State. Serious weak sauce right there. :?


Are any of them part of the Wooden deal? I can accept one or two cupcakes (and I like UMKC being one of them due to the Korver connection), but four...

Hopefully this is just a one-year scheduling-philosophy test to see just how tough the conference schedule would be.
Rik
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:39 pm
Location: Milwaukee

 

Re: Future Schedules

Postby LynchMob » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:16 pm

Do we have to have this conversation again? Already been gone through 10 times, no surprises.
Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose!
LynchMob
 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: Future Schedules

Postby LJay » Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:08 pm

Two cupcakes in a season is perfectly reasonable. Three is a stretch. Four is ridiculous.

Say we beat a dead horse if you like but four is ridiculous.
Shame
User avatar
LJay
 
Posts: 7470
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:49 am

Re: Future Schedules

Postby Jet915 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:16 pm

I don't think 4 cupcakes is that big of a deal....in the Valley? Sure, that would be crap but we are in the Big East now. Our league schedule is ALOT tougher now.
Image
Jet915
 
Posts: 7442
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:11 pm

Re: Future Schedules

Postby jayball » Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:12 pm

LynchMob wrote:Do we have to have this conversation again? Already been gone through 10 times, no surprises.



+1000000000


We have had at least three low major teams every freaking year.

Sometimes it seems like our fanbase just likes to bitch about something at all times.
User avatar
jayball
 
Posts: 1794
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:18 am

Re: Future Schedules

Postby LynchMob » Sun Jul 21, 2013 4:51 am

Honestly my only complaint is that those low majors should be in division 2. Don't hate the player; hate the game.
Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose!
LynchMob
 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: Future Schedules

Postby Wizard of Westroads » Sun Jul 21, 2013 11:05 am

I'd have preferred UNO to UMKC for a chance to see some local kids play. C.J. Carter's fun to watch. Not sure why we're not playing the Mavs, but must be a reason if we're scheduling Alcorn etc.
User avatar
Wizard of Westroads
 
Posts: 1749
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 9:36 am

Re: Future Schedules

Postby TrueBlueJay » Sun Jul 21, 2013 4:31 pm

I have zero interest in playing UNO as long as Albers is there.
User avatar
TrueBlueJay
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:26 am
Location: Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood

Re: Future Schedules

Postby WBR Tom » Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:21 pm

TrueBlueJay wrote:I have zero interest in playing UNO as long as Albers is there.


+1. Once Trev moves on, I'd be fine with playing UNO. An occasional or even regular game could be fun, and certainly a helluva lot more interesting than a buy game against a random SWAC team. But as long as he's the AD, if I had my way, the "NO" in UNO would stand for my answer to playing them.
User avatar
WBR Tom
Moderator
 
Posts: 4117
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:02 am
Location: Miramar

Re: Future Schedules

Postby JayPharmAlum » Sun Jul 21, 2013 6:46 pm

Polyfro wrote:
TrueBlueJay wrote:I have zero interest in playing UNO as long as Albers is there.


+1. Once Trev moves on, I'd be fine with playing UNO. An occasional or even regular game could be fun, and certainly a helluva lot more interesting than a buy game against a random SWAC team. But as long as he's the AD, if I had my way, the "NO" in UNO would stand for my answer to playing them.

I don't want to see CU play UNO, however, I recall seeing Ras and Trev at Cali Taco having lunch a while back so I assume they are friendly. Once UNO becomes NCAA eligible, playing them in a cheap buy game makes some sense.
User avatar
JayPharmAlum
 
Posts: 2029
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:25 am

PreviousNext

Return to Men's Hoops

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], JacobPadilla and 6 guests